People fighting for truth in the battle with lazy policing and that believe in the rights of innocent and peaceful cannabis consumers believe in the quality Kush friendly clothing offers. You know that arresting, verbalizing, put in custody, trying, releasing and the fines imposed on more than thirty thousand cannabis users annually involves a substantial number of police work. You know that this is effort that can easily be used in other places as they are needed elsewhere.
A detailed overview of these old discussions in Geneva was initially discussed. Later, it was realized that they do not matter. What matters is that the ban is maintained, and that people may assume that certain goals are achieved. The people fighting against this wrong make attempts to formulate what this ban targets.
It is not their ambition to answer the question of what dangers are wrongfully attributed. Cannabis supporters realize that these dangers are not recognized in Greece, Sweden, Holland and Belgium. Having the same hazards described in different ways depending on the country or political culture has led to a lot of change between 1936 and 2007.
If you have had the opportunity to meet people who think that good research in the field of cannabis, you will be surprised by their views. They have proven that consumption and production will affect the way in which cannabis prohibition is retained, modified, or perhaps dissolved! This recommendation aims to show that the idea claiming that cannabis prohibition has been a shield from discourse is far from scientific.
Jehoiada Verrips is an anthropologist whose work has a fascination in the religious background of ritual murders in early 20th century in Europe. The murders and the need for them would be felt as a divine commandment, they cleared the perpetrators, liberated them from a defilement that was first transferred to the victims. According to Verrips, the victims here are people, but also plants!
The actual effects have not been tested in the different political systems and people in the world are told quite seriously about these facts, which are baseless. These lies keep extending their own shelf life and thus flow across the world into some or other form of active enforcement of cannabis prohibition. In addition, all sorts of different mixtures of stories that depend on complex historical developments in different political systems have been added to spice up the lies.
The more mundane aspects of the ban also need some contemplation. The example of organizations that benefit from the culture of cannabis prohibition comes from ongoing research into cannabis arrests in New York by Harry Levine. His thesis is that the driving force behind the arrest of large and growing number of people for the possession of cannabis in the city of New York is not the use of cannabis, or any possible increase in risks for local police.
Levine concludes from numerous interviews that there are a number of benefits to the NYC cannabis arrests. It delivers very high production figures. The police needed a style of management, for which statistics of 'production' are required. It also provides police officers with a much-needed overtime, through relatively easy and risk-free work. Stand up for what you know to be true and wear quality garments, showing your support for truth.
A detailed overview of these old discussions in Geneva was initially discussed. Later, it was realized that they do not matter. What matters is that the ban is maintained, and that people may assume that certain goals are achieved. The people fighting against this wrong make attempts to formulate what this ban targets.
It is not their ambition to answer the question of what dangers are wrongfully attributed. Cannabis supporters realize that these dangers are not recognized in Greece, Sweden, Holland and Belgium. Having the same hazards described in different ways depending on the country or political culture has led to a lot of change between 1936 and 2007.
If you have had the opportunity to meet people who think that good research in the field of cannabis, you will be surprised by their views. They have proven that consumption and production will affect the way in which cannabis prohibition is retained, modified, or perhaps dissolved! This recommendation aims to show that the idea claiming that cannabis prohibition has been a shield from discourse is far from scientific.
Jehoiada Verrips is an anthropologist whose work has a fascination in the religious background of ritual murders in early 20th century in Europe. The murders and the need for them would be felt as a divine commandment, they cleared the perpetrators, liberated them from a defilement that was first transferred to the victims. According to Verrips, the victims here are people, but also plants!
The actual effects have not been tested in the different political systems and people in the world are told quite seriously about these facts, which are baseless. These lies keep extending their own shelf life and thus flow across the world into some or other form of active enforcement of cannabis prohibition. In addition, all sorts of different mixtures of stories that depend on complex historical developments in different political systems have been added to spice up the lies.
The more mundane aspects of the ban also need some contemplation. The example of organizations that benefit from the culture of cannabis prohibition comes from ongoing research into cannabis arrests in New York by Harry Levine. His thesis is that the driving force behind the arrest of large and growing number of people for the possession of cannabis in the city of New York is not the use of cannabis, or any possible increase in risks for local police.
Levine concludes from numerous interviews that there are a number of benefits to the NYC cannabis arrests. It delivers very high production figures. The police needed a style of management, for which statistics of 'production' are required. It also provides police officers with a much-needed overtime, through relatively easy and risk-free work. Stand up for what you know to be true and wear quality garments, showing your support for truth.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire